Isn't vision board success just confirmation bias?
Ali puts the sceptic's case directly: ten years of boards at twenty items each is two hundred items, so some will land by chance and you remember only the hits, like the friend you were thinking about who rang. Swart concedes confirmation bias is real and doesn't deny it, but argues the ratio of her own board items that came true, allowing that some took longer and some haven't happened yet, is well beyond random. Her fallback position is pragmatic rather than evidential: knowing what you want, putting your mind to it and taking steps towards it does make things more likely, and being open to it costs you nothing.
“so there is such a thing as confirmation bias which is obviously that when something gets proven right that we we take that as evidence…”
“if I look at the ratio of the things that I put on my board that have come true some of them have taken longer…”