The 16 Chips Time Allocation
Spend your finite daily chips on purpose so you don't regret your life.
- Difficulty
- Easy
- Time to result
- ~weeks to results
- Steps
- 5
- Confidence
- 80%
Bartlett's poker-chip model, from chapter 19 of his first book, frames each day as 24 chips. Roughly eight are spent on sleep, leaving 16 to place. Because time is finite and death is real, those 16 chips must be allocated with intentionality against your values or you risk regretting the life you lived. He uses it to explain why disciplines compete: meditation may have a favourable discipline equation yet still lose because it will not win a chip against stronger priorities in a 16-chip day. Ali extends it to relationships, noting that the point is intentional allocation, not equal allocation. Bartlett applies a different measurement framework to different goals, and to his relationship he applies no framework and no metric at all, focusing only on giving it a chip allocation that stays in harmony with everything else that matters to him. The model turns abstract prioritisation into a concrete, countable placement of scarce chips.
Origin
Bartlett introduces the poker-chip model in chapter 19 of his first book Happy Sexy Millionaire, tying it to death, the scarcity of time, and living a non-regrettable life.
Core principles
- 01You wake with 24 chips a day and roughly eight go to sleep, leaving 16.
- 02The scarcity of time is what forces intentional allocation.
- 03Allocate chips against your values or you may regret the life you lived.
- 04Different life areas deserve different measurement frameworks, and some deserve none.
How to run it
- 1
Count your chips
See each day as 24 chips, with roughly eight already placed on sleep, leaving about 16 to allocate.
Pro tip The scarcity is the point; infinite time would need no discipline.
- 2
List what truly matters
Name the things and values you care about most, from health and relationships to work.
- 3
Place the 16 chips intentionally
Deliberately allocate your remaining chips against those values rather than letting the loudest demands take them.
Pro tip Intentional allocation is not equal allocation.
Watch out Unintentional spending is how people end up regretting the life they lived.
- 4
Match the framework to the area
Apply productivity metrics where they fit, and no measurement at all where they do not, such as your closest relationship.
Pro tip Aim for harmony across allocations, not a balanced scale.
- 5
Rebalance as disciplines compete
Accept that disciplines fight for the same chips; revisit the allocation as priorities shift across seasons of life.
In the wild
Bartlett knows meditation is good and wants to do it, and even runs it through the discipline equation where it lands slightly in favour. But in a day of only 16 chips, meditation will not win a chip against stronger disciplines already competing for the calendar, so it keeps losing out despite the favourable equation.
→ A genuinely good habit stays undone because it cannot win a scarce daily chip.
Common mistakes
Letting chips drain unintentionally
Spending time on whatever is loudest instead of your values leads to a life you may regret.
Metricising a relationship
Applying productivity metrics to a relationship is a category error; some areas deserve allocation but no measurement.
Is it for you?
Best for
Anyone feeling stretched who wants to allocate time intentionally against their real priorities.
Not ideal for
People who need rigid hour-by-hour scheduling rather than a values-based allocation heuristic.
From the transcript
“We wake up with 16 chips left out of the 24. We've placed eight of them on sleep.”
“it's important to allocate your time with a certain intentionality or you might regret the life you've lived.”
“focus on the allocation that you're giving to the thing that matters to you and make sure it's in balance with the allocation of the…”
From the episode
Steven Bartlett: 9 Secret Habits of a Multi-Million Dollar Entrepreneur - Diary of a CEO
Steven Bartlett